"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

September 14, 2005
What Else?

150. that's the estimated body count from the latest round of violence in Iraq.

For those interested, Reuters is offering us a timeline of some of the major bomb attacks In Iraq since we gave them democracy and freedom.

Hunger strikers at Gitmo are getting force-fed.

To borrow from an old joke, I wouldn't want to have his nerve in my tooth. George Bush? Asking the world to have "compassion" for the "needy"? What planet is his brain from?

If the people in the U.K. have any sense, they'll hear Davis claiming "conservative compassion" and fail to vote for him by the millions.

In related news, a story this morning on NPR revealed that San Francisco is rethinking their disaster plan. They're retooling against the expectation that it will take the government 72 hours to get it's thumb out of Bush's ahem and get moving with some assistance, in the event of a major earthquake. They're building a new strategy based on the idea that if you have a disaster, the feds really don't give a shit.

Cluster bombs. They're supposed to be banned (well, yes, we use them, but we're us) but they're for sale at London's bombs n'bullets fair.

Land mines? They're illegal, so the Bush Administration is doing what they do best. They're renaming the new ones.

What the heck is this all about? Who is the Colonial Pipeline Company and why did they get precedent over the power needs of hospitals in the hurricane zone? Or was it, as it seems from reading the article, just an attempt to minimize the bad PR fallout by trying to keep gasoline flowing to the heavily populated northeast? I guess a few dead poor people isn't too high a price to pay for that.

And, by the way, it looks like the opinions are coming down...and they are...yes. Yes, Bolton has, indeed, been instrumental in derailing meaningful reform at the U.N.

Benjamin calls him Hurricane Bolton.

That's about all I can take at the moment.

(But, hey! Jeff Alworth is back and blogging. Pop on over and tell him howdy.)

(Any my apologies to those of you I haven't been responding to in the comments section. There's never enough time....)

Posted by AnneZook at 09:35 AM | Comments (1)
September 13, 2005
Here's....

The Full Roberts

Roe in Troubled Waters (Or not?) (Or, yes?) (Who knows?)

Administration stonewalling?

Conservative grilling?

CBC questions John Roberts

Judge Roberts and the Court-Stripping Movement

No Contest: Real Questions for Judge Roberts

Roberts & the 'Apex of Presidential Power'

Dignified Process?

Roberts' bad decision

Because I haven't really blogged the Roberts nomination, and I should have. And, yes, I know those are a lot of Left-leaning sites, but I cared what the Left thought of the guy. We all already know that the wingnuts on the Right find him insufficiently Stalinist and that the Christian persecution movement finds him insufficiently old testament and in any case, I've pretty much had it for one week with trying to be "balanced" to take into account the opinions of a bunch of nitwits who are still determined to pretend that the Bush Administration is peopled by competent, caring adults.

Ahem.

Because we can't object that a conservative nominee's rulings have, in the past leaned Right, can we? Maybe we can if statistics show that the majority of Federal Judges do not, in fact, tend to side with any particular ideology? (Or do they "lean" Left? I can't figure it out from the text.)

While I'm not crazy about the guy's record, I just don't know what we can do...or what else we could have expected. The man does, at least, appear to be qualified. More qualified than many of the Bush Administration's nominees, judicial or otherwise. And much less of a nutcase than some nominees have been.

The question is...if we bring him down, who would they offer up next? Or will the maniacs in the White House just appoint him during the next recess?

(Does anyone care about Bolton now? Is anyone agitating over that fiasco? Are you seeing what's happening in the U.N.?)

Posted by AnneZook at 01:16 PM | Comments (0)