"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
What's this?

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives

Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Polling Report

American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Peevish for PDA

Blog Directory


Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori

All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

June 22, 2006
Where's The News?

Not on the idiot box. Watching television "news" last night, I was trying to imagine how any citizens who get the majority of their daily news digest via the tube see recent events.

The channel we were watching had surprisingly extensive (a couple of minutes, at least) coverage of two stories, side-by-side. USofA soldiers facing charges for murdering an Iraqi civilian, and the return of the bodies of two USofA soldiers who were killed, not by Iraqi insurgents, but by the Iraqi troops they were training. My roommate was impressed by how the channel presented the two stories side-by-side and discussed what's right or wrong in a war, and whether or not we're entitled to do whatever we need to, whatever we can, or whatever "they" do in the fight.

What didn't you learn from the television? That the bodies being returned were soldiers killed nearly two years ago. That this isn't the first time USofA soldiers have been investigated for murdering civilians in Iraq. That the majority of complaints by Iraqi citizens seem to disappear into a black hole, leaving nothing but the bodies of their loved ones behind.

No speculation that the return of these bodies and the "breaking" of this (old) news on the same day that the news was released about USofA soldiers facing murder charges might be politically motivated. No discussion of the implications of the attempted cover-up.

And another story. Illegal immigration. News about how "all across the country" cities are taking matters into their own hands, not waiting on Congress, but stepping up to "fight" the tidal wave of illegal immigrants. Highlighted - One story, one town where allegedly illegal immigrants allegedly committed a robbery, a murder, and were dealing drugs. Result?

These towns are passing laws to make it illegal to rent to or employ illegal immigrants. (Well, really, "undocumented workers." Because we don't know who's trying to "immigrate" and who's just here for a while for the work.) Even making "English" their official, legal language. When asked if this wasn't a bit racist, one man (Mayor? Councilman?) said that "illegal is illegal" and that "illegal" doesn't have a race.

All "illegal immigrants" mentioned in the story were specifically labeled "Mexican" and what few pictures of people we saw (meant clearly to be illegal immigrants, whether identified as such or not) were people who appeared to be Hispanic, and the only non-English language heard in the story was Spanish.

So. Yeah. Racist and bigoted.

And stupid, since there are plenty of legal USofA citizens who don't speak English as their primary language.

No mention of the fact that this country's economy will screech to an abrupt halt without these workers.

That's all I can remember at the moment (and my lunch break is over), but I'm sitting here hoping that most people don't listen to the "evening news" and assume they have a bead on anything important that happened in the world that day.

Posted by AnneZook at 01:00 PM | Comments (2)
June 21, 2006
Evaluation, for the novice

When it comes to evaluating changes to presidential power, think of the opposition party president you've disliked the most in your life and ask yourself. "If he had had this power, would it have disturbed, worried, or angered me?

When it comes to evaluating intent around a piece of legislation, it's wise to ask yourself, "Does this have a named sponsor? Is it a piece of legislation laid out in the full light of day, or has someone made a clear effort to hide it from view?"

When it comes to evaluating Republicans, you can't go wrong in assuming that something like this is a blatant attempt to whip up a little Southern Pride and corral a few more rightwing votes in November.

When it comes to evaluating the MSM, try reading this, because Engelhardt is always worth listening to. Interesting and entertaining.

Posted by AnneZook at 12:50 PM | Comments (0)