"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. Truth was never put to the worse in a free and open encounter..."
~ Milton
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~Benjamin Franklin

Reading:
A Fistful of Euros
Andrew Tobias
Angry Liberal
Archy
Bad Attitudes
Common Dreams
Fablog
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
Madelaine Kane
Mahablog
Obsidian Wings
Off the Kuff
Orcinus
Sarah Kendzior
War and Piece
Washington Monthly

Books
The Emerging Democratic Majority (Judis & Teixeira)
Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Franken)
Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot (Franken)
The True Believer (Hoffer)
Still Being Bushwhacked

All Book Reviews
Race, Gender, and Sexuality
It's always "us" vs "them"
Women's March on (fill in your location)
Children learn what their parents teach them.
You Got My Support. But.
Even Endangered Penguins Do It

All Race, Gender, and Sexuality
Campaigns and Voting
Where do we go from here?
It's always "us" vs "them"
Some interpretations
On and on I go
Just appalled

All Campaigns and Voting
Lecture Circuit
It Was 40 Years Ago Today
July 2, 1964
Pledge
May 14-15, 1970
The Erotica of Bare Knees

All Lecture Circuit
Media
The Liberal Media, At It Again
Fairly UNbalanced
P.S.
What's this?
OHMIGOD

All Media
Big Brother
Shoulda' Guessed
Where did my country go?
You know what you never thought you'd read?
Not in his name
Sleight of Hand

All Big Brother
World O'Blog
It's Vocabulary Time!
They wrote it
Mighty-fine blogging
Other People Said....
Phillipines

All World O'Blog
Aimless Ranting
It's always "us" vs "them"
So, I'm thinking with half my brain
Do You Know Peter?
Long, Little Privacy Rant
My Takeaway

All Aimless Ranting
Archives
February 05, 2017 - February 11, 2017
January 22, 2017 - January 28, 2017
January 15, 2017 - January 21, 2017
November 13, 2016 - November 19, 2016
October 09, 2016 - October 15, 2016

All Weekly Archives


Electioneering
Open Secrets
Political Wire Exit Polls
Politics1
Polling Report

Information
American Research Group
Center for Democracy and Technology
Center for Public Integrity
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Congressional Report Cards
Death Row Roll Call
DebtChannel.org
Democracy Now
Economic Policy Institute
FairVote Colorado
Foreign Policy In Focus
Global Exchange
Human Rights Watch
Independent Judiciary
Inequality
Institute on Money in State Politics
Institute for Public Accuracy
JobWatch
Lying in ponds
Media Reform
Media Transparency
Move On
One World
Open Democracy
Pew Research Center
Project Censored
Public Citizen Health Research Group
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Take Back The Media
The Urban Institute
WHO Outbreak News

Connections
XML & RDF
Peevish for PDA



Blog Directory


Search








Credits
Powered by Movable Type

Site Design by Sekimori





All content © 2002-2005 Anne Zook

April 02, 2010
Hypocrisy Is

Hypocrisy is jumping on chances to diss religion and make bad and offensive jokes about archaic superstitions, then taking advantage of an offer to leave early on a Friday "for the Easter weekend."

I never said I wasn't a hypocrite, you know.

Posted by AnneZook at 04:12 PM | Comments (0)
April 01, 2010
Pope Abuse!

Apparently talking about the hundreds and hundreds of children sexually abused by priests while the Catholic church was more concerned with cover-up than prosecutions is just unfair.

Apparently, talking about a particularly egregious case that was coming to a trial of sorts--even though only inside the church's 'trial' procedures and not in a criminal court--until the trial was derailed by a pre-Pope is just--it's so unfair to talk about that pre-Pope priest, now that he's Pope-ing, that the people around him are getting pissed.

As near as I can figure, from reading both stories, their defense goes something like this: "While it is true that mistakes were made, it can nevertheless be argued that someone else made them and in any case a mistake made by a man can't be held against a Pope and it's against the rules to talk about the man before the Popery."

Also: "We're gonna let god sort it out."

Vatican official: Newspaper report on pope 'lacks fairness'

Emphasis mine:

Cardinal William Levada, an American who heads the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said the newspaper "lacks fairness" and that it accuses the pope of "leniency and inaction" in dealing with abuse cases.
Though Levada criticized the Times for a "series of articles" that lack fairness and are "rushing to a guilty verdict," the cardinal was particularly angered by a Friday report about the abuse of as many as 200 deaf boys in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, by the now-deceased Rev. Lawrence Murphy.
In its article Thursday about Levada's remarks, the Times said the allegations "drew on documents obtained from lawyers suing the church that showed that Vatican officials had at first ordered a secret canonical trial, then asked the archdiocese to suspend it after the priest pleaded for leniency to Cardinal Ratzinger [now Pope]. Wisconsin church officials protested the suspension, but followed it."

Sounds like leniency to me. (I don't care if the guy was sick and only wanted to "die in peace." He wasn't entitled to die in peace, not after what he did. Even if he didn't survive the trial, his victims deserved to see him brought to trial. They deserved peace, he didn't.)

Milwaukee Archbishop Jerome Listecki apologized repeatedly Tuesday night for the way his archdiocese handled the Murphy case, and he defended the Vatican, saying church officials and civil authorities in Milwaukee made mistakes, not Rome.

This is the place where mistakes were made but it was always someone else who made them. The trial was suspended by order of the Vatican ("Rome") and over local protests, but then later someone else says mistakes were made by local officials and "Rome" didn't have anything to do with how a mass rapist escaped prosecution.

Lies upon lies upon cover-ups.

Vatican Official Defends Popeís Handling of Case

ďThis is different, because itís the pope and because itís a pope who is most self evidently beyond accusation, particularly in this area,Ē said a senior Vatican official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly.

Yeah, I'm not seeing it that way.

Case after case after case--an avalanche of proof that hundreds upon hundreds of instances of priests raping kids came to his hands when he was the one with the authority and the power to do something.

Because he streamlined procedures, he's "beyond accusation"? I'm sorry, but I can't find making it easier to report crimes inside the bureaucracy--out of the public eye and away from the threat of criminal prosecution--to be all that praiseworthy.

No, "beyond accusation" would have been a man who defied the bureaucracy, obeyed the law, and spoke out publicly in defense of the children.

Honestly compels me to admit that, for the Catholic Church, streamlining bureaucratic procedures was probably the most progressive thing they'd done in a thousand years,* so I'm willing to believe that, while not wanting to jeopardize his job and career path, the pre-Pope had certain instincts to do the right thing.

At least he did something, you know? I don't care if every one of those pedophiles thinks he has a direct line to some almighty power--people's delusions are their own problem--but the idea that these men are allowed hide behind archaic laws to avoid trial and prison for the heinous crimes they commit really pisses me off.

It's the 21st century. I think it's time we stopped pretending that just because a man puts on a little black dress and a string of beads, he's somehow beyond the law.


_______________

* The idea that the Catholic church didn't start seriously trying to clean the pedophiles and rapists out of their priestly population until it was practically the 21st century really wigs me out.

Posted by AnneZook at 02:41 PM | Comments (2)