Yes, I marched.
And, yes, I intended to stay active, but that's not why I gathered y'all here today.
What struck me hardest on Saturday was that we weren't having "a" march. We were having about a dozen marches, with all of the participants lumped together in one huge crowd in each city.
In Denver, we had anti-Trump marchers, Equal Pay marchers, Stay-Outta-My-Womb marchers, anti-Sexual Predator marchers, anti-White-Women-Trump-Voter marchers, anti-Russian marchers, feminist marchers, pro-LGBTQ+ marchers, environmentalist marchers, and a bunch of other groups I can't at this moment remember, including one subset of marchers who just pleaded for a general return to sanity. Overall, a very inclusive group. No one squabbled and we all shared each other's chants fairly equally.
It probably lacked the sheer energy of 100,000 people gathered for a single purpose, but those people showed up, waited patiently as we dealt with crowds three or four times larger than expected, then moved out and marched in their turn. They were committed.
Not everyone shared the same experience.
A group of Indigenous women in DC were treated with appalling insensitivity by some of the women around them. (Was this a failing of "feminism" to be educational and inclusive or just normal human stupidity on display?)
I've read that some of the WOC (Women of Color) were insulted by the pink hats since not all women have pink vulvas.
Seriously. Neon pink was not chosen because it's the color of white women's genitalia, it isn't, but because of the whole blue=boy, pink=girl thing.*
Some women were insulted by the pussy hats since not all women have vulvas.
Pussy hats were not chosen because the march was only inclusive of people with a certain configuration of genitalia. They were a response to the Chump's offensive, demeaning "grab 'em by the pussy" comment.
The intent was not racist or sexist or genitalist (if there is such a word).
The objections bothered me, though. I was--disturbed to realize that a number of groups took the hat idea (and the coloring) as a personal slight--as excluding them from the moment.
Was there a better symbol for a Women's March at that moment in time?
I honestly can't think of one.
Was there a better color to denote "women"?
Not in this society, no.
And yet, a significant subsection of the marcher population were offended by the symbolism, offering interpretations that would never have occurred to me, any more than it would have occurred to me to have objected to the neon pink because my own, personal woman-bits don't actually glow in the dark.
* I think it was a good choice. This way, the Chump's staff can't steal any of the images and reuse them to his advantage, the way they did the Obama inauguration photo. Those seas of hot pink hats are unmistakeable.